Legal Opinion

Wheadon v. Froelich

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1991No. 59090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Judge.

Plaintiff Robert Wheadon appeals the dismissal of his petition against police officers who were involved in his arrest for possession of cocaine. Finding his brief does not comply with the requirements of Rule 84.04, we dismiss the appeal.

I. Background

In his pro se petition, plaintiff set forth two counts. As best we can discern, Count I is a libel action against two of the eight police officer defendants. In it, he charged that one officer knowingly made false statements against plaintiff in a sworn affidavit which was used to secure a search warrant. Additionally, he claimed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arenson v. ArensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Snelling v. StephensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Jim Medve Investment Co. v. BailousMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of Hatten v. Mercantile Bank of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Hansen v. Missouri Real Estate Appraisers CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Sutton v. KestlerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. White v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API