Arenson v. Arenson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Presiding Judge.
Appeal dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 84.04.
After an approximately ten year marriage, which produced no children, wife filed a petition for dissolution. The decree was entered on July 6, 1989. Husband then filed this appeal. Upon appeal, both parties represent themselves pro se.
When a party represents itself pro se, the party must still satisfy all the relevant rules of procedure and this court cannot hold a pro se party to a lower standard of performance. Snelling v. Stephenson, 747 S.W.2d 689, 690 (Mo.App.1988). One of the rules which an appellant must…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Draper v. AronowitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Snelling v. StephensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ferrara v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Hall v. Missouri Bd. of Probation and ParoleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. ConawayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Corley v. JacobsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Cain v. Buehner and BuehnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.