Legal Opinion
Burrece v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided February 5, 1999No. A-6688PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
976 P.2d 241 (1999)
Lareene BURRECE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Alaska, Appellee.
No. A-6688.
Court of Appeals of Alaska.
February 5, 1999.
Eugene B. Cyrus, Eagle River, for Appellant.
Kenneth M. Rosenstein, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellee.
Before COATS, Chief Judge, and MANNHEIMER and STEWART, Judges.
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
Lareene Burrece pleaded no contest to one count of fourth-degree misconduct involving a controlled substance.[1] She preserved her right to appeal the order denying her unsuccessful attack on the search warrant for her…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Winfrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
- United States v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010