Legal Opinion

State v. Barker

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 17, 1999No. 22383-0-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The question is whether evidence resulting from an arrest should be suppressed not because of any constitutional violation, but because the arresting officer lacked statutorily required training. The answer is no.

A police officer can exercise “peace officer powers” 1 if he or she is a “general authority Washington peace officer,” 2 a “limited authority Washington peace officer,” 3 a “specially commissioned Washington peace officer,” 4 or a “[fjederal peace officer.” 5 A police officer can also act as a private citizen under some circumstances. 6

According to both parties, this case involves a…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. BarronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Inniss v. Tandy Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API