Winfrey v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Chief Judge.
Cameron Winfrey was convicted of driving while intoxicated. 1 He appeals, claiming that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the results of the breath test after finding that state troopers had interfered with his right to make a phone call under AS 12.25.150(b). He also claims that the district court erred when it excluded on relevancy grounds evidence that the troopers had decided to stop videotaping breath test ing procedures because the videotapes made prosecuting drunk drivers harder. On the first issue, we agree with the district court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. SundbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Ward v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Zsupnik v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006