Legal Opinion

Finley v. Steenkamp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 2000No. 2-99-127-CVPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM J. DAY, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this appeal, we must decide whether giving presuit notice of a health care liability claim to a health care provider as required by section 4.01 of the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act (“the Act”) tolls the statute of limitations applicable to a non-health care provider defendant on a related negligence claim. Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 4590i, § 4.01(a), (c) (Vernon Supp.2000). We must also determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing a health care liability claim with prejudice after the plaintiff failed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roark v. STALLWORTH OIL AND GAS, INCTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Woods v. William M. Mercer, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Whitworth v. Blumenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  3. In Re HinterlongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Rittenhouse v. Sabine Valley Center Foundation, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  5. Williams v. Briscoe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API