Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. American Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 5, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-2742PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Veronica M. Wetzel, has instituted this action against defendant, American Motors Corporation, to recover for the purchase of an allegedly defective 1986 Renault Alliance Sedan; the parties are of diverse citizenship and jurisdiction is asserted under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The first three counts of the amended complaint are based on Pennsylvania statutory law. Count I asserts a claim under the Pennsylvania Automobile Lemon Law, 73 Pa.Cons. Stat. § 1952 et seq. Count II is based on the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Johansson v. Central Garden & Pet Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  3. Chavis v. Fidelity Warranty Services, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
  4. Pierre v. Planet Automotive, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  5. Voelker v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API