Legal Opinion

Spackman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1940No. Appeal, 198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This appeal by B. M. Spackman, trading as Eastern States Transportation Company, is from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, finding that she was not a bona fide contract carrier within the “Grandfather Clause” of Article VIII, section 804(a) 1 of the Public Utility Law of May 28,1937, P. L. 1053, 66 PS §1304(a), and accordingly refused her application and directed her to cease and desist from transporting property in common carriage between points in Pennsylvania.

The application was protested by the interveners herein on the ground that the service…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. GornishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Erb v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Bickley v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Puhl v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Infantino v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Merchants Parcel Delivery, Inc. v. Pa. Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API