Legal Opinion
Norvell v. McGraw-Edison Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 29, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 65-C-205PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Jurisdiction
1. This court has jurisdiction of the subject matter, including the counterclaim of defendant, and of the parties. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C., and the antitrust laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C., and this court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(a) and 1400(b), also under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and the declaratory judgment law, 28 U.S.C. § 2201.
Parties
2. The original plaintiff, Edmund C. Norvell, Jr. (“Norvell”), of Bloomington, Minnesota,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company v. Fredman Brothers Furniture Company, Inc., and Harry Fredman, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Harry Fredman, Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co. v. Fredman Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975