Legal Opinion

Stott Realty Co. v. Orloff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1933No. Docket No. 149, Calendar No. 36,829PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

This is appeal from decree dissolving the Stott Realty Company, a corporation.

In 1916, David Stott died, leaving a large estate, including controlling interests in several corporations. Among them was the Stott Realty Company, his stock in which he left in trust for his four daughters, Bertha, Eleanor, Ethel, and Julia, and his three sons, David, Ernest, and Arthur. After a time, the trust was closed and the corporate shares divided among the beneficiaries in practically equal amounts. They have all the stock except six shares belonging to Thomas Danahey, the general manager of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edison v. Fleckenstein Pump Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Turner v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stott v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barnett v. International Tennis Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Mahlen Land Corp. v. KurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Flemming v. Heffner & FlemmingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Campau v. McMathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Levant v. KowalMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API