Legal Opinion

Mahlen Land Corp. v. Kurtz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959No. Docket 4, Calendar 47,516PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This matter involves alleged wrongdoing with corporate assets. The legal principles involved' are well established. The facts are somewhat more involved, due, primarily, to irreconcilable differences in the testimony of witnesses.

The bill of complaint, filed by the Mahlen Land Corporation (Mahlen), George H. Pastor Development Company (Pastor), A. Jerome Geisler, Florence Geisler, George H. Pastor, and Mahala L. Pastor, charged that defendant Paul Kurtz (Kurtz) “as the then secretary obtained and retained in his possession some of the corporate property and assets including, among other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGuire v. RabautMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. United States v. ShibleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  3. Greenough v. GreenoughMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Crowley, Milner & Co. v. MacOmb Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Miller v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Elsasser v. American Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Armstrong v. Ypsilanti Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Band v. Livonia AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API