In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Hart

(dissenting) — A decision whether to reinstate a disbarred attorney requires analysis of the eight criteria established in In re Eddleman, 77 Wn.2d 42, 44, 459 P.2d 387, 461 P.2d 9 (1969). Although the majority opinion recognizes as much, and goes so far as to list the Eddleman factors, the remainder of the analysis is not tied to these factors. The majority's disparate treatment of the petition in this case cannot be justified.

The majority also fails to give sufficient weight to the Board of Governors' findings of fact in this case. The Board's evaluation of the Eddleman factors led it to…