People v. Cogswell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
A witness’s preliminary hearing testimony is admissible at trial if the witness is “unavailable” despite the exercise of “reasonable diligence” by the party seeking the witness’s attendance. (Evid. Code, § 1291.) At issue is whether, to show “reasonable diligence” in obtaining the presence at trial of a sexual assault victim living outside California, the prosecution in this case had to ask a court to order the victim taken into custody and transported to California to testify at defendant’s trial.
On a visit to California, a Colorado woman was sexually attacked. At the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. LouisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. SánchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. ChristensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. FoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.