Legal Opinion

People v. Cogswell

California Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2010No. S158898PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

A witness’s preliminary hearing testimony is admissible at trial if the witness is “unavailable” despite the exercise of “reasonable diligence” by the party seeking the witness’s attendance. (Evid. Code, § 1291.) At issue is whether, to show “reasonable diligence” in obtaining the presence at trial of a sexual assault victim living outside California, the prosecution in this case had to ask a court to order the victim taken into custody and transported to California to testify at defendant’s trial.

On a visit to California, a Colorado woman was sexually attacked. At the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. LouisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. SánchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. ChristensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. FoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API