Legal Opinion

In Re Ketchel

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1968No. Crim. 11452PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*398TOBRINER, J.

After defendant’s conviction of murder in the first degree and sentence to death, this court appointed counsel on the automatic appeal (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b)). We now face a narrow issue: whether we should affirm the trial court’s order to the warden of the penitentiary to permit the examination of defendant by a psychiatrist selected by that counsel. Since we hold that counsel is entitled to full communication with his client by direct interview or by interviews through experts who may aid counsel, and since we cannot see how the interview would interfere with the safe…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Robert Alton Harris v. Daniel Vasquez, Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. Keenan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API