Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Viereck

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1926No. 8859. [fn*]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In two separate counts, the one charging slander, the other malicious prosecution, the appellee sought damages in this action against the appellant as the result of the utterance against him of a statement, alleged to be defamatory, as follows:

"I saw Hawley Viereck standing on the running board of a Ford auto truck at the corner of Felcman's confectionary store and fire the first shot; I saw one of the Bell boys, the smallest one in working clothes, lurch forward."

After demurrer and a general denial, appellant specially admitted making the statement to L. Trimble, a state ranger, sent to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hott v. YarboroughTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Johnson v. King & DavidsonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shannon v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Eastman v. Leiser Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Marathon Oil Co. v. Salazar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Thomas v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. JC Penney Company v. GilfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. American Surety Co. v. WhiteheadTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API