Clark v. City of Manhattan Beach
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Plaintiffs, as property owners, sued for an injunction to prevent the issuance and sale by defendants of ninety thousand dollars of municipal improvement bonds, and from a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
The facts show that Manhattan Beach is a city of the sixth class; that on November 7, 1914, its board of trustees determined that public interest and necessity demanded that the said city incur a bonded debt of ninety thousand dollars for the construction and completion of wharves upon dr adjacent to the waterfront of said city to be owned and operated by said city, one to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Lee v. PrewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Clark v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Kenworthy v. MastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Oakland v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McCarthy v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Wahl v. SpeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- White v. Board of Education of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Gayle v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Henderson v. Dawson CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.