City of Oakland v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed.to the City Clerk of the City of Oakland. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is a petition for mandate against the respondent, who is city clerk of the city of Oakland, to compel him as such official to countersign certain municipal bonds of petitioner. The proceedings culminating in the voting of the bonds are set forth in full.
The respondent pleads by demurrer, and admits the due performance of all the acts taken by the officers of the city, and admits likewise the regularity and sufficiency of the election proceedings and of the election. He bases his refusal to countersign the bonds upon two grounds—1. That the proceedings culminating in the- special election…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Law v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Kansas City v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- City of Lexington v. Kentucky Chautauqua AssemblyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reagan v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. WoodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Blaine v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Clark v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hart v. Board of Education of Nevada School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.