Legal Opinion

Patchak v. Township of Lansing

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1960No. Docket 55, Calendar 48,283PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Once again we are cast in the role of a glorified zoning board. Defendant city of Lansing has appealed from a decree of the Ingham county circuit court, in chancery, in which the court held that ordinance No 8 of the township of Lansing- as applied to plaintiffs’ 15 acres was void; that the action of the township board in refusing to rezone the 15 acres was arbitrary, capricious, and confiscatory; that the reasonable and proper use of the property was for a trailer camp park; and that the entire 15 acres could be developed and modernized as such, continuing its nonconforming use subject to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Senefsky v. City of Huntington WoodsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. City of WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Sabo v. Monroe TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Nickola v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API