Jackson v. Conrad
West Virginia Supreme Court
Supersedeas to a judgment of the circuit court of Gil-mer county, rendered on the 16th day of March, 1877, affirming a judgment -of the county court of said county rendered on the 12th day of August, 1875, in an action of debt in said court then pending, wherein Jackson, Wiant & Co. were’plaintiffs and C. B. Conrad and others were defendants, allowed on the petition of said defendants.
Read the full summary
Supersedeas to a judgment of the circuit court of Gil-mer county, rendered on the 16th day of March, 1877, affirming a judgment -of the county court of said county rendered on the 12th day of August, 1875, in an action of debt in said court then pending, wherein Jackson, Wiant & Co. were’plaintiffs and C. B. Conrad and others were defendants, allowed on the petition of said defendants. Hon. John Brannon, judge of thesixth judicial circuit, rendered the judgment complained of. The facts of the case fully appear in the opinion of the Court, cited the following authorities: Acts 1872-3, ch. 226,…
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Judge
The plaintiffs instituted an action of debt, in the county court of Gilmer county, against the defendants, for the use of William T. Wiant, purporting to be based upon a judgment rendered September 28, 1867, by one Thomas E. Floyd, then a justice of Glenville township in said county. To the declaration the defendants demurred, and pleaded nul tie! record and payment, to which pleas plaintiffs replied generally, and issue was thereon joined. The’ defendants also tendered four special pleas, to the filing of which the plaintiffs objected.'
The court overruled the demurrer, and sustained the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. SolazoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cunningham v. Birch River Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796
- Lee v. TapscottCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1796