Legal Opinion

United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 26, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

This is a consolidated action wherein plaintiff, United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency, an agency of the United Nations, hereafter referred to as “UNKRA,” seeks to recover $900,000 damages from two corporate defendants. The controversy centers about a contract dated June 25, 1954, for the design and construction of a flat glass plant in the Republic of Korea, the signatories to which were UNKRA and the defendant, Frazier-Simplex International Corporation, hereafter called “International.”1 Although the defendant Frazier-Simplex, Inc., hereafter referred to as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Deyo v. . HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Moers v. . MoersNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc., United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Frazier-Simplex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Hammond Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  3. United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc., United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Frazier-Simplex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc., United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Frazier-Simplex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API