Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc., United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Frazier-Simplex, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 17, 1961No. 224, 225, Docket 26496, 26497Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWaterman, Circuit Judge

I would not only affirm the judgment of the district judge in favor of Frazier-Simplex, Inc. in Docket Number 26497 but I would also affirm his judgment in favor of Glass Production Methods, Inc. in Docket Number 26496. I am content with Judge Weinfeld’s discussion and disposition, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1960, 184 F.Supp. 51, 61-62. I am convinced that the proper interpretation of the February 16, 1955 letter agreements, without more, is the interpretation placed upon them by the district judge.

However, as the opinion of the court below points out, there was more. The February 16 letters terminated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United Nations Korean Reconstruction Agency v. Glass Production Methods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API