Legal Opinion
Congdon v. Uber Techs., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 8, 2018No. Case No. 16–cv–02499–YGRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
a. Rules Governing Contract Interpretation
"Interpretation of a contract is a matter of law, as is the determination of whether a contract is ambiguous." Beck Park Apartments v. U.S. Dep't of Housing & Urban Dev. , 695 F.2d 366, 369 (9th Cir. 1982) ; see also Wolf v. Sup. Ct. , 114 Cal. App. 4th 1343, 1351, 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 649 (2004). "Under statutory rules of contract interpretation, the mutual intention of the parties at the time the contract is formed governs interpretation." Santisas v. Goodin , 17 Cal. 4th 599, 608, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 830, 951 P.2d 399 (1998) (citing Cal. Civ. Code § 1636 ).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Imes v. Fox Rothschild, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024