Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Matson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 27, 1985No. 6413-1-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

Judith Matson appeals a court ruling which upheld the validity of a prenuptial agreement. The trial court found the property distribution was "grossly disproportionate", but, in essence, found the agreement valid because Judith Matson "was advised of her opportunity to seek advice and counsel of her own choosing".

Prior to their marriage on March 21, 1970, Judith Calvin and James Matson discussed and ultimately signed a prenuptial agreement. Mr. Matson initiated preparation of the agreement because he had children by a previous marriage and intended to preserve his separate estate in its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Friedlander v. FriedlanderWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In Re the Marriage of HadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Norris v. NorrisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re the Marriage of MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re Estate of HollettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. In Re the Marriage of AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Fletcher v. FletcherOhio Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API