Legal Opinion
Randolph v. HV and United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 2, 2017No. 16-0678/CGPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Appellant Thomas Randolph’s prosecution for various charges, including rape and assault, is ongoing. At the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA), alleged victim HV successfully challenged the military judge’s order requiring the Government to disclose to the defense some of her mental health records. Appellant petitioned this Court for review. We granted review, and specified the question of our own jurisdiction. We conclude that Congress has limited review of Article 6b(e) petitions to the Courts of Criminal Appeals, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Solorio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Lopez de VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- LRM v. KastenbergCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re C. PU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- Randolph v. HV and United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
- United States v. AndersonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.