Farrish Co. v. Harris Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to set aside verdict.
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant's refusal to accept merchandise sold to it by plaintiff. The goods in question were cotton scrim. Plaintiff was a commission house. The merchandise was sold at twenty-five cents per yard, and had been purchased by plaintiff at a net cost to it of twenty-four cents per yard. The date fixed for delivery was May twenty-ninth. The evidence showed that at the time of defendant's refusal to accept . there was no market for the merchandise; that plaintiff made reasonable efforts to sell the same…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pollen v. . Le RoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Todd v. . GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Moore v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Derami, Inc. v. John B. Cabot, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- USAR Systems, Inc. v. Brain Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Brook Iron Works, Inc. v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930