Legal Opinion
USAR Systems, Inc. v. Brain Works, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 11, 1995No. 95 Civ. 2188 (PKL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This action alleges copyright infringement, breach of contract, and fraud. Plaintiff is USAR Systems, Inc. (“USAR”). Defendants are Brain Works, Inc. (“Brain Works”) and Avi Telyas. In a Memorandum Order issued on May 31, 1995, the Court denied USAR’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissed this action for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction.
USAR has moved for reconsideration. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.
DISCUSSION
I. Propriety of New Arguments on Motion for Reconsideration or Reargument
USAR has styled its motion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- T. B. Harms Company v. Edward Eliscu and Ross Jungnickel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Septembertide Publishing, B.V. v. Stein And Day, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bassett v. Mashantucket Pequot TribeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Bassett Entertainment Corp. v. Mashantucket Pequot TribeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000