Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1979No. 414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

Following a non-jury trial, appellant was convicted of three counts of receiving stolen property. 1 His post-trial motions for arrest of judgment or a new trial were denied by the court below, and this appeal challenging sufficiency of the evidence was timely filed. When the court below authorized its opinion in compliance with Pa.R.A.P. No. 1925(a), it determined that judgment should be arrested on two of the three counts. Therefore, appellant appeals from his conviction of only one count of receiving stolen property, on which he was sentenced to nine to twenty-three months of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. FergusonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. HenleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Com. v. Jiggetts, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Com. v. Stevenson, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API