Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Henley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1983No. 3161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is a Commonwealth appeal from the lower court’s sustaining a demurrer to the evidence charging appellee with attempting to receive stolen property because the crime was legally impossible. We find that the legal impossibility defense has been abolished in Pennsylvania and, accordingly, reverse and remand for trial.

On December 22, 1980, the Commonwealth’s informant entered appellee’s jewelry store and offered to sell appellee five gold chains that had been specially coated by law enforcement officials. Appellee, clearly made aware that the chains were stolen, paid the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. United States v. Martin Molina Oviedo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. HenleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. StaffordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API