Legal Opinion

Schoolcraft v. Simpson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to' Grand Traverse; Mayne, J. Replevin by Owen Schoolcraft and Chauncey E. School-craft against Oscar Simpson, sheriff. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of replevin. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

The Wade Brothers were at one time engaged in buying potatoes. The Armour Refrigerator Car Company had a claim against them of upwards of $400. It sued out a writ of attachment, which writ was placed in the hands of the defendant, who, under the direction of the attorney for the Armour Refrigerator Car Company, who claimed the potatoes belonged to the Wade Brothers, levied upon the potatoes, — about 1,350 bushels, which were in cars 8,182, 4,756, and 4,624 on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. QuackenbushMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiewel v. TannerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Kophal v. WeisenbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API