Legal Opinion

Seawell v. Universal Fidelity Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2006No. Civ.A. 05-479PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM/ORDER

POLLAK, District Judge.

Plaintiff Donja Seawell (“Seawell”) has moved for certification of a class pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 in this FDCPA case. For the reasons given in the discussion to follow, Seawell’s motion will be granted.

I

This litigation arises from defendant Universal Fidelity Corporation’s (“Universal”) alleged mailing of form debt collection letters to Seawell and other putative class members. Seawell alleges she received a letter from Universal that contained the following heading, in large font, in the letterhead: “Administrative Office Record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Anthony Graziano v. Michael HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Piel v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Wilborn v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chakejian v. Equifax Information Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. McCall v. Drive Financial Services, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Stanich v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Blandina v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Jones v. Advanced Bureau of Collections LLPDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API