Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Laurence Semel, Bankrupt. Laurence Semel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 21, 1969No. 17578PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GANEY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves a bankrupt’s appeal from an order of the District Court denying his petition for review of an order of the referee. In the statement of all the property of the bankrupt accompanying his voluntary petition in bankruptcy, Laurence Semel, Esquire, licensed to practice law in New Jersey, stated that no debts were due him on open account, but that an amount estimated at $100 is due him for “Possible claims for professional services rendered, damages, possible contingent fees on legal matters heretofore handled, costs and disbursements…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Mauch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- In Re Thomas. Thomas v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Hudson v. WylieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In re LTV Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of Nathan MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Garland JeffersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Appearance of Alvin S. Michaelson, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.