Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. v. Haenszel
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Boggins, Judge.
{¶ 1} This is an appeal by plaintiff-appellant, Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc., from the October 27, 2004 decision of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.
{¶ 2} There are seven appellees: John Roth, William Kleeh, Douglas Brochar, Andrew Haenszel, Nathan Williams, Larry Pangalangan, and Tony Somers.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 3} Appellant, Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. (“Dexxon”), was formed in June 2003 for the purpose of acquiring certain assets of Digital Storage, Inc. (“DSI”) and its parent company Daisytek…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Hydrofarm, Inc. v. OrendorffOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Dart v. KatzOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re Nicole Gas Production, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Joseph Bros. Co., L.L.C. v. Dunn Bros., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.