Legal Opinion

Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. v. Haenszel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 2005No. 04CAE11074PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boggins, Judge.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal by plaintiff-appellant, Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc., from the October 27, 2004 decision of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas denying its motion for a preliminary injunction.

{¶ 2} There are seven appellees: John Roth, William Kleeh, Douglas Brochar, Andrew Haenszel, Nathan Williams, Larry Pangalangan, and Tony Somers.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶ 3} Appellant, Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. (“Dexxon”), was formed in June 2003 for the purpose of acquiring certain assets of Digital Storage, Inc. (“DSI”) and its parent company Daisytek…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Garono v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Procter Gamble Company v. StonehamOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Danis Clarkco Landfill Co. v. Clark County Solid Waste Management DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kendall Holdings, Ltd. v. Eden Cryogenics LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
  2. Hydrofarm, Inc. v. OrendorffOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Dart v. KatzOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. In re Nicole Gas Production, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Joseph Bros. Co., L.L.C. v. Dunn Bros., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API