East Side Canal & Irragation Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions to be used on an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Application for writ of mandate to compel the settlement of a bill of exceptions by the judge of the superior court of Merced County, said bill of exceptions to be used on an appeal from an order of said court denying the motion of petitioner to tax the costs on appeal in the action entitled Thomas G. Tuner, as Administrator, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Company, Defendant.
It appears from the petition that in the trial of said action judgment passed for defendant and plaintiffs appealed. The judgment was reversed by the supreme court and remittitur was filed with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Mallory v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holmes v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928