Legal Opinion

Klouda v. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 27, 2002No. 99-1560PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Chief Justice.

Mark Klouda and Michael Mayberry, the plaintiffs in this case, appeal from the district court’s denial of declaratory and injunctive relief. They argue that Iowa Code sections 907.8A and 908.11 (1999) violate the separation-of-powers doctrine of the Iowa Constitution. The challenged statutes create a pilot project in the sixth judicial district. They transfer jurisdiction over probation revocation cases from judges to administrative law judges employed by the Iowa Board of Parole. Because we agree the statutes violate the separation-of-powers doctrine, we reverse and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Channon v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. Iowa District Court for Black Hawk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. State v. LongoSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Webster County Board of Supervisors v. FlatterySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. RaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API