State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. Ragland
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CADY, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we must decide if the district court erred in resentencing a defendant who was convicted as a juvenile of first-degree murder and mandatorily sentenced to life without parole after he claimed his sentence violated the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and after the Governor of Iowa commuted the sentence to sixty *110years without parole. We conclude the district court properly resentenced the defendant. We affirm, the sentence imposed by the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Jeffrey Ragland was seventeen years old…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Commonwealth v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- State of Iowa v. Shaunta Rose HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.