Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. Ragland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 16, 2013No. 12–1758PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, we must decide if the district court erred in resentencing a defendant who was convicted as a juvenile of first-degree murder and mandatorily sentenced to life without parole after he claimed his sentence violated the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment and after the Governor of Iowa commuted the sentence to sixty *110years without parole. We conclude the district court properly resentenced the defendant. We affirm, the sentence imposed by the district court.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Jeffrey Ragland was seventeen years old…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. State of Iowa v. Denem Anthony NullSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. State of Iowa v. Shaunta Rose HopkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API