Legal Opinion

State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice Richardson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 2017No. 14–1174PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

After pleading guilty to second-degree murder, the defendant was ordered to pay $150,000 in mandatory restitution to the estate of the victim. See Iowa Code § 910.3B (2013). The defendant was fifteen years old at the time of the offense. We are asked to decide whether Iowa law authorized the sentencing court to consider the age of the defendant and related circumstances before ordering this restitu*611tion. If not, we must determine whether mandatory minimum restitution violates the defendant’s rights under article I, section 17 of the Iowa Constitution.

For the reasons…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Noah Riley CrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State of Iowa v. Brian Patrick ClemensSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Amended September 26, 2017 State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Blue Grass Savings Bank v. Community Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2020
  5. Brianne Garrett, as of the Estate of Betty Peer v. IRC II, Inc. d/b/a The Shores, The Shores at Pleasant Hill, Pleasant Hill the Shores an Immanuel Community (and related fictitious names); Immanuel; Myra Waltersdorf; and unknown/unnamed staff personalCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API