Legal Opinion
Moore v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 1983No. Civ. 65528PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Defendant and appellant the Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (Ohio) appeals from the granting of a judgment in an action to enforce an undertaking in which the trial court awarded to plaintiff and respondent J. Arthur Moore (Moore) the full amount of the $8,500 undertaking issued by Ohio as surety guaranteeing compliance by Miguel Taico and Antonio Taico (Taicos).
We modify the trial court’s award and affirm as modified.
Procedural and Factual Background
On June 27, 1980, the trial court granted Moore’s motion for summary judgment in an unlawful detainer action against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fresno Enterprise Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Baker v. BartolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. Seaboard Surety Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. WennerholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- County of Orange v. Classified Ins. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mark Briggs & Associates, Inc. v. Kinestar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- First v. ArmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. Accredited Surety & Casualty Company, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021