Legal Opinion
Tanner v. Phoenix Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 5, 1990No. 890521-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Judge:
This declaratory judgment action involves a claim for minimum personal injury protection benefits mandated by Utah Code Ann. § 31A-22-307 (Supp.1990), a part of Utah’s no-fault automobile insurance statute. 2 The trial court granted “summary judgment” to The Phoenix Insurance Company (Phoenix), without explanation, and ordered the dismissal of Tanner’s complaint, based on its view of the meaning of the household services benefit provision in section 31A-22-307(l)(b)(ii). Under this section, personal injury protection benefits must include
a special damage allowance not exceeding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Division of Consumer Protection v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- P.I.E. Employees Federal Credit Union v. BassUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Stanton Transportation Company v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ferro v. Utah Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Derbidge v. Mutual Protective Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Sneddon v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- Miller Welding Supply, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Commission, Auditing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. BeasonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.