Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Pizza Co. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 3, 2007No. CIV. 04-4170PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH
VERONICA L. DUFFY, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The district court, the Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, referred to this court for decision the Motion to Quash Subpoena [Docket No. 148] filed by Plaintiff Pinnacle Pizza Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Pinnacle”). As this is a non-dis-positive motion, it is within this court’s authority to resolve. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
FACTS
On June 7, 1991, Pinnacle and Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. entered into a franchise agreement in which Pinnacle agreed to act as franchiser of a number…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Johnnie Tasby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Margie P. Hollins v. Robert Lee PowellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- B.B. v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), Ltd. v. Coventry First LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Lamar Advertising of South Dakota, Inc. v. KayDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2010