Legal Opinion
Miller v. Tilley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1949No. 13957PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The question for decision is whether the findings of the District Court that claims 3, 4 and 7 of United States Letters Patent No. 1,888,234 and claims 1, 2 and 5 of United States Letters Patent No. 1,960,276 were void for want of invention, are clearly erroneous. The District Court entered a judgment of dismissal of this action, in which the defendants (appellees) were charged by Edward J. Miller, the plaintiff (appellant), with having infringed the above specified claims of these two patents, which are owned by him. He seeks a reversal upon the ground that the court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Picard v. United Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Frank Adam Electric Co. v. Colt's Patent Fire Arms Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Alemite Co. v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Miller v. ZahariasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- J. D. Bradley v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Louis Dreyfus & Cie. v. Panama Canal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- South Side Lumber Co. v. Stone Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- Trico Products Corporation v. Delman Corporation Delman Corporation v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Robert E. Caldwell, an Individual, and Caldwell Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Kirk Manufacturing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.