Legal Opinion

Estate of Sletto v. Aarness

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The state has a claim. The dispute is over the amount and the preference to be accorded in the matter of payment as against the homestead and dower rights of the widow.

The amount of the claim is to be arrived at by following sec. 604q, Stats. 1898, Sanborn & Sanborn’s Anno. Supp. 1906, until its repeal in 1919, and from then on under the rule recognized in Guardianship of Sprain, 219 Wis. 591, 263 N. W. 648, where the statutes are reviewed. This results in an allowance of $3 per week for the charges from December 6, 1907, to March 12, 1908, and the “value” thereafter.

The administrator objects…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Frame v. PlumbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Travelers' Insurance Co. v. FrickeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sprain v. State Board of ControlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State ex rel. Time Insurance Co. v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Department of Public Welfare v. DeBakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Department of Public Welfare v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. GrassmanOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State Board of Control v. BanskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Costs in Liquor Control Board CasesPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API