Costs in Liquor Control Board Cases
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
1Opinion of the Court
Reno, Attorney General,
We have your request to be advised concerning whether the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is liable for court costs arising from litigation involving the board.
At the outset, it must be noted that the right to recover costs depends entirely upon statute. In Cooper’s Estate, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 277, 279 (1929), the rule is set forth ns follows:
“Statutes relating to costs are strictly construed. Hoover v. Sch’l Dist., 4 Pa. C. C. Rep. 520; In re Braintrim Sch’l Dist., 23 Pa. C. C. Rep. 510; Arnold v. McKelvey, 26 Pa. Dist. Rep. 717; Stewart v. Baldwin, 1 Penrose & Watts…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Baker v. KirschnekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Pittsburg v. Sterrett Subdistrict SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Jones v. TathamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Blossom Products Corp. v. National Underwear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.