Davis v. Reynolds
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions by defendant. Action on the case to recover damages for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations in the sale of certain real estate in Somerset County. At the return term of the writ, the defendant filed a general demurrer which was joined by the plaintiffs. The demurrer was overruled and the defendant excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
This action on the case is brought by plaintiffs to recover damages for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations in the sale of real estate. To the declaration defendant demurred and the case is here upon exceptions to the pro forma ruling of the court below overruling the demurrer.
The declaration alleges that defendant on the first day of September, 1903, owning an interest in a bond for the conveyance of a *62certain mill and timber land, employed one Frank R. Reynolds to falsely and fraudulently represent to plaintiffs that he, said Frank R. Reynolds, owned a bond for the conveyance of said mill…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Eaton v. SontagSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Legler v. TylerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923