Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1934Published

1ConcurrenceFairchild, J.

I differ with the majority as to the grounds on which the decision should be based. I agree that the demurrer should be overruled, but because the facts alleged show a cause of action for fraud practiced upon plaintiff and his assignors, and not because of breach ■ of contract.

Statements by a party, in negotiating a contract, of matters within its scope but omitted from it, are ordinarily no part of the agreement, and proof of such negotiations as being a part of the contract is usually prohibited under the parol-evidence rule. Derbeck v. Albright, 186 Wis. 515, 203 N. W. 337. This rule…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Nichols v. . PinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Dowd v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
  3. Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API