Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceFairchild, J.
I differ with the majority as to the grounds on which the decision should be based. I agree that the demurrer should be overruled, but because the facts alleged show a cause of action for fraud practiced upon plaintiff and his assignors, and not because of breach ■ of contract.
Statements by a party, in negotiating a contract, of matters within its scope but omitted from it, are ordinarily no part of the agreement, and proof of such negotiations as being a part of the contract is usually prohibited under the parol-evidence rule. Derbeck v. Albright, 186 Wis. 515, 203 N. W. 337. This rule…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Nichols v. . PinnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Dowd v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- First Nat. Bank v. SwanWyoming Supreme Court · 1890
- Pollard v. McKenneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.