Legal Opinion
Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'n
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 13, 1994No. 2:94-cv-73231PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 25, 1994, after receiving evidence and hearing oral argument, I granted plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order permitting them to participate in cross-country races at their respective high schools. I found that plaintiffs were entitled to immediate relief because plaintiff Ronald Sandison was scheduled to participate in a cross-country race on the hearing date and plaintiff Craig Stanley was scheduled to participate in a race within 10 days after the hearing date. This Opinion and Order is in response to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Delorean Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Nicholas Knapp v. Northwestern University, an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation, and Rick TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Ronald G. Sandison v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Communities for Equity v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.