Legal Opinion
Rieger v. Arnold
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 2002No. C034625, C035383PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*455Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Melanie Rieger claimed to have been a victim of job discrimination in the form of a sexually harassing “hostile” work environment. (E.g., Weeks v. Baker & McKenzie (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1146 [74 Cal.Rptr.2d 510] (Weeks).) She filed an action alleging this and other theories against the defendants Clayeo C. Arnold, his office manager (Susan Artenstein), and his professional law corporation. (Rieger v. Arnold (Super. Ct. Sacramento County, 1997, No. 97AS03390).) The defendant law firm and defendant Arnold filed an action against the plaintiff seeking,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hope v. California Youth AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Meeks v. AutoZone, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- KAUFMAN & BROAD v. Performance PlasteringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.