Legal Opinion

American General v. Equitable General

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 18, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 78-0639-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WARRINER, District Judge.

The parties are presently before the Court with respect to the motion of defendants Henry K. Willard, II (Willard) and Robert Sanders (Sanders), joined in by defendants George C. Boddiger (Boddiger), and Mary W. Chatelain, executrix of the estate of Leon Chatelain, Jr. (Chatelain), (referred to collectively as “movants”), to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) the cross-claims of third-party defendant Continental Casualty Company (Continental). The issue presented to the Court is whether the third-party defendant, Continental, is permitted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fogel v. United Gas Improvement Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Murray v. Haverford Hospital Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Paur v. Crookston Marine, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Virginia Academy of Clinical Psychologists v. Blue ShieldDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  2. Georgia Ports Authority v. Construzioni Meccaniche Industriali Genovesi, S.P.A.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1988
  3. Luyster v. Textron, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Hansen v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Longo v. Trojan Horse Ltd.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API