Lohr v. Stanley-Bostitch, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
JOSEPH G. SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a diversity action arising under the laws of the State of Michigan. Plaintiff’s claim arises from an industrial accident that occurred on March 15,1989, while plaintiff was employed in the furniture industry. On that date, plaintiff was using a pneumatic stapler designed, manufactured, and owned by defendant. The stapler, which was on loan from defendant to plaintiff’s employer, accidentally discharged a staple, which ricocheted and injured plaintiff’s right eye.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nachtsheim v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Theodore Koloda v. General Motors Parts Division, General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Reginald Exum v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Uitts v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Kramer v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Enron Corp. Savings Plan v. Hewitt Associates, L.L.C.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Cornelius v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1996
- Ree v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- BPP Retail Properties, LLC v. North American Roofing Services, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.