O'Brien v. Analog Devices, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Upon a motion for summary judgment made by the defendant Analog Devices, Inc. (Analog), a judge of the Superior Court decided that none of the materials furnished by the parties (affidavits, depositions, documents) demonstrated legal justification for the claim made by the plaintiff Kathleen O’Brien that she had been offered a job with Analog for life. We affirm.
O’Brien’s initial position, as articulated in her complaint, was that employment policy handbooks made available to O’Brien contained “statements evidencing Analog’s intention of long term employment for O’Brien so long as she abided…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Kirkley v. F. H. Roberts Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ng Bros. Construction, Inc. v. CranneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- O'Brien v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Boothby v. Texon, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Doe v. Harbor Schools, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Phinney v. MorganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.