Legal Opinion

Burckhalter v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1940No. Appeals, 187 and 188PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action in trespass was brought for damages for injuries sustained by the wife plaintiff on defendant’s premises. Binding instructions having been refused defendant, the case was submitted to a jury and verdicts for plaintiffs returned. Judgments were entered on the verdicts, after motions for a new trial and judgments n. o. v. were dismissed, and these appeals! followed.

On October 4, 1938, a few minutes after five o’clock, the store’s closing hour, Mrs. Burckhalter was leaving defendant’s store in Butler, Pennsylvania, by the same way by which she had entered.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Markman v. Fred P. Bell Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Kulka v. NemirovskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Vetter v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Muehlhof v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Max Azen, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Connelly v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Cox v. ScarazzoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Hallbauer v. ZARFOSSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API